<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Tech-Recipes - Latest Comments in ZFS: Create a raidz filesystem</title><link>http://tech-recipes.disqus.com/</link><description>Cookbook of Tech Tutorials</description><atom:link href="https://tech-recipes.disqus.com/zfs_create_a_raidz_filesystem_solaris_system_administration_tech_recipes/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 11:39:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: ZFS: Create a raidz filesystem</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/1418/zfs-create-a-raidz-filesystem/#comment-103548745</link><description>&lt;p&gt;FYI: as of Solaris Express 11, disk usage is reported correctly:&lt;br&gt;"zfs list" will show the size of the volume (minus parity)&lt;br&gt;"zpool list" will show the size of the volume (including parity)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Kwiecien-Fisher</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 11:39:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ZFS: Create a raidz filesystem</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/1418/zfs-create-a-raidz-filesystem/#comment-8728408</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In fact 30% is almost like having 2 disks space available in 3 disk RAID-5 array, right?&lt;br&gt;I would consider them the same in general - done in hardware or software, still requires a drive for parity.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tomasz Miklas</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:55:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ZFS: Create a raidz filesystem</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/1418/zfs-create-a-raidz-filesystem/#comment-4572975</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Would it be correct to assume that utilizing raidz would make data about 30% bigger in size but with the advantage of having an ever-expanding RAID-5? As to say that instead of having the typical trade-off of a RAID-5 with the array minus one HDD... and in this case roughly 30% file size increase? Just wondering.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:42:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>