<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Tech-Recipes - Latest Comments in PPTP (Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol) through PIX Firewall | Cisco firewall | Tech-Recipes</title><link>http://tech-recipes.disqus.com/</link><description>Cookbook of Tech Tutorials</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:58:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: PPTP (Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol) through PIX Firewall | Cisco firewall | Tech-Recipes</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/382/pptp-point-to-point-tunneling-protocol-through-pix-firewall/#comment-2767415</link><description>There is a nice solution for Connecting a Cisco PIX to Windows Vista.&lt;br&gt;Configure L2TP without certificates to seamlessly migrate from PPTP to L2TP.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://support.dmu.edu/VistaandCiscoPIXpptp/index.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://support.dmu.edu/VistaandCiscoPIXpptp/ind...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:58:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PPTP (Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol) through PIX Firewall | Cisco firewall | Tech-Recipes</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/382/pptp-point-to-point-tunneling-protocol-through-pix-firewall/#comment-2767414</link><description>&amp;lt;ul id="quote"&amp;gt;&amp;lt;h6&amp;gt;Anonymous wrote:&amp;lt;/h6&amp;gt;Try adding "fixup protocol pptp 1723" instead of all of the changes above.&amp;lt;/ul&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is right on, works like a champ. This only works in PIX version 6.3.3 and up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The fixup now takes care of translating the GRE tunnel to a natted  internal ip.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 02:53:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PPTP (Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol) through PIX Firewall | Cisco firewall | Tech-Recipes</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/382/pptp-point-to-point-tunneling-protocol-through-pix-firewall/#comment-2767413</link><description>you need to check your recipe! you should never open port 137,138,139 to any machine from the internet. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PPTP uses TCP 1723 and GRE (protocol 47) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ports 137-139 are opening HUGE HOLES in your network security. Especially if it is to a Microsoft server, esentialy you have told people to open their windows shares to the World. NEVER OPEN these ports.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; I don't coment on much but this is bad networking practices at their worst.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ko</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2004 09:35:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PPTP (Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol) through PIX Firewall | Cisco firewall | Tech-Recipes</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/382/pptp-point-to-point-tunneling-protocol-through-pix-firewall/#comment-2767412</link><description>Try adding "fixup protocol pptp 1723" instead of all of the changes above.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:21:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PPTP (Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol) through PIX Firewall | Cisco firewall | Tech-Recipes</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/382/pptp-point-to-point-tunneling-protocol-through-pix-firewall/#comment-2767411</link><description>I've got a same problem... If I delete the static rule, all other computers have an Internet access otherwise not :?  :cry:</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 21:15:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PPTP (Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol) through PIX Firewall | Cisco firewall | Tech-Recipes</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/382/pptp-point-to-point-tunneling-protocol-through-pix-firewall/#comment-2767410</link><description>ok I'm a newbie when it comes to setting up this pix.  When I add that static statement and the other access-list commands I can get into the network via vpn just fine, but all the computers on the inside network lose internet access.  I took out the access-list and still had the same problem so I'm pretty sure it's caused by that static entry.  Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fluffy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2004 04:15:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>