<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Tech-Recipes - Latest Comments in Outlook:  Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message</title><link>http://tech-recipes.disqus.com/</link><description>Cookbook of Tech Tutorials</description><atom:link href="https://tech-recipes.disqus.com/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message_microsoft_outlook_tech_recipes/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:57:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Outlook:  Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/#comment-155008690</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I got the same problem and it was due to overlapping rules. The best solution is to go over your rules and delete duplicates or near duplicates. It took me 2 good hours to do it, but now the dupes are gone.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KameRlot</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:57:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook:  Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/#comment-113167142</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this post. I was clueless on what is going on. I think this should be default on any rules.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:36:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook:  Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/#comment-111067021</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm now trying the "stop processing more rules" trick on sorting rules and also putting them at the end of the list. Will see whether that fixes my problem. Anyway, thanks everyone for the tips.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fred</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:25:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook:  Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/#comment-111062058</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, it's a mess, an ugly TRILLION-$$$$ mess. At my main work machine I use Thunderbird, rules work mostly fine. At our main client I've also got an e-mail account with ton of incoming technical spam (such-or-such operation succeeded - 1 to 24 times a day for many operations) and they use GRMBL Outlook which isn't able to provide a sensible, reliable interface to sort them out ! (Got the same duplicates problem.) With all the $$$$$ bucks M$ likely put into the program, you wonder why they can't make things work ? And this even at the simplest level: resizable dialogs, anyone ? Not Micro$$$$oft !!! Maybe in their recommendation guidelines, but not in the Rule system of $$$$$$ Outlook !&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fred</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 08:59:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook:  Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/#comment-78484045</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you soo muchhhhhh......&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vivek_p_kapa</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 03:45:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook:  Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/#comment-78484006</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thn you soo much&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vivek_p_kapadia</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 03:44:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook:  Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/#comment-67040129</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When I click Apply in the Rules and Alerts dialog box, I get a message saying that there's the Stop Processing More Rules will stop other rules from running and asking if I'm sure I want to do this. I want all the rules to run, so I don't understand why you would want this setting. Also, Outlook 2010 is adding it in by itself when I click Apply; it's not in the rule itself.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ellen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 15:07:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook:  Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/#comment-8209756</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks a lot for suggesting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chetan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:11:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook:  Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/#comment-5572122</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is not a reliable work around.  It only works in *some* situations, and actually makes the problem uglier because it then becomes difficult to see why rules are not being executed as expected.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have a suspicion that some rules are process on the exchange server, and some rules are processed locally.  Somewhere along the line, a hand-off is made, and I don't believe the message is ever handed back to the server to process server based rules.  It's a real mess regardless of what's happening.  "Stop processing more rules" worsens things, because sometimes messages take the wrong path, and other times they are duplicated anyway because of parallel server/local processing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Outlook users only have an illusion that they have control over the processing of their mail.  Advanced users should switch to linux, and use *procmail*, the holy grail of mail processing.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheap Bastard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 04:07:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook:  Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/#comment-5265573</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You probably have to re-order your rules.&lt;br&gt;Most probably you have got some rules "relocating" some types of messages into specific directories. these "belong to" rules must be "seated" at the end of the list!&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eryador</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:01:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook:  Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/#comment-5265518</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thanks a million. eyes opening.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eryador</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 08:55:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook:  Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/#comment-3448001</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This tip worked for a while, at first.  But now, I am getting duplicate and triplicate messages again, and all my rules already have the "stop processing more rules" clause.  Any ideas?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StarSphere</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 18:37:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook:  Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/#comment-2767470</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Like I say - works like a charm - exactly what I was googling for and the first/top hit too :) I've had experience with rules like that before (Eudora, among others) but it just wasn't so obvious with outlook.. kind of hidden among many other options, when it's so important - it should really be a checkbox by itself at the end or something.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Andrew Derry&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 06:32:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook:  Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/#comment-2767469</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I found that this helped my duplicates hugely. To get around the issues listed in prior posts, I put my rules in order of importance, so that I would catch most of my duplicates. Prioritizing definitely seems to have helped. JM2cents&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trem01</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2005 04:42:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook:  Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/#comment-2767468</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks a lot, I have been searching the Web for several hours to find this &lt;strong&gt;perfect&lt;/strong&gt; solution!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good job!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:31:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook:  Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/#comment-2767467</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks! that was just what I was looking for! A+!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JAKendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 08:07:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook:  Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/#comment-2767466</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;ul id="quote"&amp;gt;&amp;lt;h6&amp;gt;netringer wrote:&amp;lt;/h6&amp;gt;My experience is that "stop processing more rules" doesn't work as you would think.   It looks to me like "stop processing more rules" is followed even when the test condition doesn't match.&amp;lt;/ul&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've had the exact same problems you've described; I believe that "stop processing more rules" is always executed despite what the rules wizard may tell you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is there another solution to the initial problem?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2004 02:34:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook:  Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/#comment-2767465</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm running Outlook 2002, and the "stop" only works if the condition is met - i.e. the intuitive case.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marc</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2004 03:56:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook:  Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/#comment-2767464</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Man, this had been bugging me for a long time. Great tip.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">niall</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2004 12:22:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook:  Rules Create Multiple Duplicate Message</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/413/outlook_rules_create_multiple_duplicate_message/#comment-2767463</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My experience is that "stop processing more rules" doesn't work as you would think.   It looks to me like "stop processing more rules" is followed even when the test condition doesn't match.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You put in a rule:  "check messages when it arrives where subject contains "viagra", delete it and stop processing more rules.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It goes check all messages,  if the subject contains "viagra", delete it, &lt;strong&gt;then&lt;/strong&gt; (even if not containing "viagra")  stop processing more rules  - not as you might expect, "stop processing more rules"  &lt;strong&gt;IF&lt;/strong&gt; the subject contans "viagra."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I had to remove the "stop processing" instruction in my early spam handler rules to get the behaviour I wanted.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">netringer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2004 07:57:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>