<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Tech-Recipes - Latest Comments in Google Boolean and Advanced Searching | Google | Tech-Recipes</title><link>http://tech-recipes.disqus.com/</link><description>Cookbook of Tech Tutorials</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:39:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google Boolean and Advanced Searching | Google | Tech-Recipes</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/237/google-boolean-and-advanced-searching/#comment-15233793</link><description>Oh, yeah!  That would totally rock.  It would make it more much useful to those doing research on the power of utilizing google searches for prediction models, for example.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davak</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:39:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Boolean and Advanced Searching | Google | Tech-Recipes</title><link>http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/237/google-boolean-and-advanced-searching/#comment-15229524</link><description>Thanks.  I wish they had nested Boolean, or whatever you call it, e.g.:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(("darth vader" OR "vader, darth") AND ("skywalker, luke" OR "luke skywalker")) OR "star wars genealogies"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">facebook-6850109</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 09:36:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>