-
Website
http://www.tech-recipes.com/ -
Original page
http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/96/change-solaris-dns-client-settings/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
davak
83 comments · 1 points
-
Web Design
3 comments · 1 points
-
danishbacker
9 comments · 1 points
-
flexinfo
11 comments · 1 points
-
Tonychelle
4 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Facebook: How To Get Only Status Updates on Your FB Home Page
1 week ago · 4 comments
-
Firefox: Enable Case Sensitive Searches When Using Find (Ctrl+F)
4 days ago · 1 comment
-
Windows 7: How To Disable Live Preview for Taskbar Thumbnails
1 week ago · 2 comments
-
Gmail: How to block a sender from your inbox
2 weeks ago · 3 comments
-
Our first iPhone game GreenThumb available in the App Store
3 weeks ago · 2 comments
-
Facebook: How To Get Only Status Updates on Your FB Home Page
lately I HAVE seen reference to a "java dns client" that I think is used to keep a 'static looking' reference to a box that is using dhcp, but this
is relatively new and probably should be referenced by some other term.
pjn
There is software related to the client access of DNS servers. Libaries of code including getservbyname(). What about dig? nslookup? These would be DNS clients, by definition.
That said, I'm personally disgusted by Microsoft's perversion of DNS. Trying to make Windows play nicely with a heterogeneous DNS environment. can be taxing.
There is software related to the client access of DNS servers. Libaries of code including getservbyname(). What about dig? nslookup? These would be DNS clients, by definition.
That said, I'm personally disgusted by Microsoft's perversion of DNS. Trying to make Windows play nicely with a heterogeneous DNS environment. can be taxing.</ul>
Get over it, Microsoft does a lot what the federal (and local) government does, they go by THE COMMON DENOMINATOR and create everyday terms so the technical and least technical people can have a conversation. Not a perversion by any standard, more of a universal language. You proved it right there, from your response you understood what the question WAS and what is was PERCEIVED AS, thus judging by who asked that question you would easily know this is not a highly technical user or operator because of the "dns client" statement, so you went with the "not a literal" approach. Case in point, not a perversion, a universal translator.